SAAF - Strong
African American Families
Personnel
Zaheerah Biggers, Project Coordinator
Natalie Sigman, Assistant Project Coordinator
Olive Conyers , Retention
Specialist
Cady Berkel, Graduate Assistant
Description
The Strong African American Families (SAAF) project evaluates the
effectiveness of a 7-week interactive educational program for African
American parents and their early adolescent children. The intervention
program is based on an empirically-based model of the processes
linked to psychological adjustment, substance use and high-risk
behavior in rural African American youth. Early adolescence is the
period in which children gain increasing control over their behavior,
begin forming friendships based on similarities and common interests,
and develop attitudes toward substances and substance use. The attitudes
and behaviors that they develop during this time influence their
achievement motivation, academic performance and friendship selections,
which in turn place them on a developmental trajectory leading toward
or away from substance use. The SAAF program is designed to strengthen
positive family interactions and to enhance parents’ efforts
to help their children establish and reach positive goals during
this critical transition between childhood and adolescence.
The SAAF curriculum is based on data collected in two other Center
studies, Families In It Together (FIIT) and
the Family and Community Health Study (FACHS).
These studies survey large numbers of African American families
residing in rural areas about the kinds of things that parents and
children do that foster competence. The SAAF program targets the
following predictors of child competence: (1) family routines, parent-child
relationship quality, no-nonsense discipline, monitoring and communication
and parental involvement with the child’s school; (2) self-regulation
and emotion regulation; and (3) the cognitive antecedents of adolescent
risk behavior, including the formation of prototypes of drinking
youths and willingness to drink in risk-conducive situations.
Project Goals
1. To test the efficacy of the SAAF program in:
• Developing structured family environments, supportive
mother-child relationships, monitoring of child behavior outside
the home and maternal involvement at school;
• Promoting the development of self-regulation, emotion
regulation and positive personal outlooks;
• Fostering unfavorable prototypes of youths who drink and
favorable prototypes of non-drinkers, helping youths to develop
realistic perceptions of their peers’ drinking, and decreasing
their willingness to expose themselves to drinking-conducive peer
groups and situations;
• Delaying the onset and lowering the rate of substance
use in rural African American youth.
2. To explore the mediating mechanisms through which specific
components of the SAAF program affect the onset and escalation of
the use of alcohol and other substances among rural African American
youth.
Intervention Component
The intervention component of the SAAF project is called the SAAF
program. It consists of a series of 2 ½ -hour group sessions
(7 initial sessions and 2 booster sessions). During the first half-hour
of the meetings the participants are served a meal. This is intended
to be a time for family members and group leaders to build rapport
with one another. During the next hour, the parents/caregivers and
youth meet separately with their assigned facilitators. During the
second hour, everyone comes together for a group meeting with all
of the families. Thus, all parents and youths receive 14 hours of
prevention training. All sessions are videotaped.
The SAAF curriculum is designed to:
• Help parents/caregivers learn nurturing skills that support
their children;
• Teach parents/caregivers effective ways to discipline
and guide their youth;
• Give youth a healthy future orientation and an increased
appreciation of their parents/caregivers;
• Teach youth skills for dealing with stress and peer pressure.
Facilitators are African American community members who are trained
to teach the SAAF curriculum. One facilitator leads the parent/caregiver
portion of the session, while two facilitators share the responsibility
of leading the youth sessions. All three group leaders participate
in the family session. To insure the integrity of the intervention,
program content is presented in videotape format. Facilitators follow
curriculum modules for each session and document and summarize what
happens in each session. As well, they receive ongoing supervision,
including sporadic direct observations made by the field supervisor.
Treatment Efficacy Component
Families are randomly assigned to a treatment or control group.
During the same 7-week period that the intervention families participate
in the prevention sessions, the control families receive three leaflets
via postal mail. One describes various aspects of development in
early adolescence, another deals with stress management, and the
third provides suggestions for encouraging children to exercise.
Families in both groups are pre-tested one month before the SAAF
program begins and post-tested three months after the sessions end,
producing a 7-month interval between pretest and posttest.
During the pre- and post-test data collections, a research assistant
visits the home to administer a 2-hour interview with the parent
and child individually. These interviews are conducted privately,
with no other family members present. During the visit, the research
assistant enters family members’ responses into a laptop computer.
These interviews incorporate several self-report questionnaires
designed to measure intervention-targeted parenting behaviors and
indicators of targeted youth protective factors. Sample parenting
behaviors include involved-vigilant parenting, adaptive racial socialization,
communication about sex and clear communication of expectations
about alcohol use. Sample indicators of youth protective factors
include future-oriented goals, resistance efficacy, negative images
of drinkers, acceptance of parental alcohol influences, and negative
attitudes toward alcohol use and sexual activity.
The effectiveness of the intervention program is tested using structural
equation modeling (SEM), which can be applied to the evaluation
of models that include hypothesized sequences of intervention effects
on proximal and distal outcomes. As well, SEM also allows simultaneous
examination of intervention effects on interrelated constructs,
such as targeted parenting behaviors and youth protective factors,
while controlling measurement error.
Family Recruitment and Retention Strategies
In each of the six counties included in the sample, community
members serve as liaisons (link to list) between the university
researchers and the county residents. Many of these individuals
have worked with the Center on other ongoing investigations of African
American families and have served as community liaisons for several
years. They are well-respected, familiar members of the communities
in which they live. They compile rosters of children within each
county who meet the sampling criteria using information from parents,
teachers, pastors, youth groups and community organizations. Families
are selected randomly from these rosters.
After a child has been selected for participation, a community
liaison contacts the child’s family to schedule an appointment
for a home visit, during which the project is explained and the
family’s participation is solicited. The personal relationship
established between the community liaison and the family is pivotal
to families’ participation. S/he describes the program and
encourages family members to ask questions and share any concerns
they may have. Emphasis is placed upon the contribution that the
family would make by helping the researchers understand family life
among African Americans living in rural Georgia.
All families receive $150 upon completion of each wave of data
collection, for a total of $450 for families who complete the entire
study. Additional incentives include a complete dinner for family
members at each training group session, round-trip transportation
and babysitting services, if needed.
The community liaison maintains monthly contact with all families
during the period when they are participating in the study. At recruitment,
families are asked to provide names of relatives or friends who
will always know their whereabouts; and twice each year they receive
a newsletter that include a stamped address correction form to facilitate
the updating of participant address lists. These efforts at ongoing
contact have been essential in maintaining participants’ commitment
to longitudinal projects conducted at the Center.
Preliminary Results
• After participating in the SAAF program, parents engage
in more regulated, communicative parenting than parents in the control
group do. As well, youths who participated in the SAAF program report
higher levels of protective factors than youths who did not participate.
(Brody et al, 2004)
• Regulated, communicative parenting and youth protective
factors actually declined in control families from pre-to post-test,
while they increased in the intervention families. These striking
results suggest that the SAAF program may have derailed potential
declines in these two factors during the 7-month assessment period.
(Brody et al, 2004)
• Changes in the targeted youth protective factors were
mediated through the SAAF program’s effects on their caregiver’s
communication and parenting behaviors. (Brody et al, 2004)
Timeline
Approximately 700 families will participate in the SAAF project
between 2001 and 2006. Approximately 400 will participate in the
family education group sessions, while 300 control families will
receive home educational materials to read on their own.
For Cohort One, consisting of 200 intervention and 150 control
families, the data collection timeline was as follows:
• Fall, 2001: pre-test data collection
• Spring, 2002: families attend 7 group sessions of educational
intervention
• Summer, 2002: post-test data collection
• Fall, 2002: families attend 2 booster sessions
• Spring/Summer, 2003: follow-up data collection
For Cohort Two, consisting of the remaining 350 families, the
timeline will be:
• Fall, 2002: pre-test data collection
• Spring, 2003: 7 group sessions of educational intervention
• Summer, 2003: post-test data collection
• Fall, 2003: families attend 2 booster sessions
• Spring/Summer, 2004: follow-up data collection
Links
United Negro College Fund
Nat’l Education Association
The Search Institute
Nat’l Study of Youth
and Religion
Parent Link
Parenting Resources
for the 21st Century
Nat’l Clearinghouse for Alcohol/Drug
Info
Nat’l Campaign to prevent
Teen Pregnancy
Planned Parenthood
|